Your browser does not support JavaScript!


Iveco Daily vs Ford Transit - comparision

The Iveco Daily IV (2014 with a 2019 update) and the Ford Transit MK9 (since 2019) are two of the most common European vans used in cargo transport. Both models offer multiple wheelbase and roof configurations, modern diesel engines, and various load capacities. In this comparison, we will examine their dimensions and cargo volume, engine options and performance, fuel efficiency, technologies and maintenance aspects.

Dimensions and Cargo Capacity

Iveco Daily L2H2

Total length: 5720 mm

Wheelbase: 3520 mm

Rear door height: 1800 mm (H2 roof)

Load volume: ~10.8 m³

Ford Transit L2H2

Total length: 5531 mm

Wheelbase: 3300 mm

Exterior height: 2553 mm (H2 roof)

Sliding door height: 1564 mm

Load volume: ~11.5 m³


Iveco Daily L4H3

Total length: 7230 mm

Wheelbase: 4100 mm

Rear door height: 2000 mm (H3 roof)

Load volume: up to ~19.6 m³

Ford Transit L4H3

Total length: 6704 mm

Wheelbase: 3750 mm

Exterior height: 2778 mm (H3 roof)

Load volume: ~15.1 m³

Engines and Performance

The Daily IV uses robust 3.0L (and earlier 2.3L) diesel engines. Transmissions include a standard 6-speed manual or an optional ZF 8-speed (HI-MATIC) automatic. The Daily also offers RWD and optional 4x4 drive. The Transit MK9 is powered by 2.0L EcoBlue diesel engines (105, 130, 170, 185 hp) paired with 6-speed manuals or automatics. Front-wheel, rear-wheel, or all-wheel drive are available. There are also 2.0L mild-hybrid versions (130 and 170 hp) and a full-electric E-Transit with 184 kW motor for urban use.

Iveco Daily IV

Engine: 3.0L MultiJet3 diesel

Power: 146 – 210 hp

Torque: 350 – 470 Nm

Other: 2.3L diesel (up to 156 hp) in older models; eDaily (electric) available

Drivetrain: RWD (4x2); optional 8-speed auto or 4x4; axle up to 4x4

Ford Transit MK9

Engine: 2.0L EcoBlue diesel

Power: 105 – 185 hp

Torque: 360 – 415 Nm

Other: 2.0L hybrid (130/170 hp); E-Transit electric (184 kW)

Drivetrain: FWD/RWD/AWD; 6M6 or 6A6 gearbox

Fuel Consumption and Efficiency

  • Iveco Daily IV: ~7.5 – 8.5 L/100 km
  • Ford Transit MK9: ~6.8 – 7.5 L/100 km

Technologies

Both models feature modern safety and comfort tech. The Daily IV includes advanced driver aids such as lane departure warning, autonomous emergency braking, and crosswind assist. Multimedia in the Daily has evolved to support Bluetooth and optional touchscreen navigation. The Ford Transit offers systems like Pre-Collision Assist, Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane-Keeping Alert, and a 360° camera (in higher trims). Its SYNC 3/4 infotainment with touchscreen provides navigation and smartphone integration. Electric power steering and stability control are standard on both.

Iveco Daily IV

Safety: Autonomous Emergency Braking, lane departure warning, crosswind assist

Multimedia: Radio/Bluetooth with optional touchscreen; 12V/24V power sockets

Convenience: Cruise control, hill holder; sturdy chassis for heavy loads

Ford Transit MK9

Safety: Pre-collision assist, optional 360° camera, lane-keeping aid

Multimedia: SYNC 3/4 touchscreen (8–12"), navigation, Apple CarPlay/Android Auto

Convenience: Adaptive cruise control, automatic headlights, parking sensors

Reliability and Maintenance

Long-term costs are important for fleet vehicles. The Iveco Daily is known for its ruggedness; fewer frequent faults are reported, though owners may encounter DPF (diesel particulate filter) regeneration issues or occasional electrical gremlins. Service intervals are regular. Genuine Parts for Iveco Daily tend to be slightly more expensive than Transit parts. The Ford Transit’s EcoBlue engines have common issues with AdBlue systems (injector and sensor failures) and fuel pump wear. Maintenance is straightforward, and parts (brakes, filters, belts) are widely available at low cost; Parts for Ford Transit are generally cheaper.

Summary

  • Iveco Daily IV: Built on a truck chassis, it provides greater cargo capacity and payload (19.6 m³, up to ~2.0+ ton payload), with strong 3.0L diesel engines (up to 210 hp). It is ideal for heavy loads and long-distance durability. Fuel consumption is a bit higher (~7.5–8.5 L/100km) and parts tend to cost more. However, its proven ruggedness suits intense commercial use.
  • Ford Transit MK9: Offers a full range of 2.0L EcoBlue engines (105–185 hp), with low-emission mild-hybrid and electric versions. It is more maneuverable in city driving, uses slightly less fuel (~6.8–7.5 L/100km), and has widely available, affordable parts making maintenance economical. Cargo volume is smaller (max ~15.1 m³) than the Daily.

The final choice depends on use case: choose the Daily for maximum cargo volume and heavy-duty performance; choose the Transit for a smaller, feature-rich van with lower running costs. For maintenance, check our store: parts for vans.

 
Use keywords to find the product you are looking for.
Advanced Search
Transit Center in Europe